Open Linguistics

332 papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 332 papers published in Open Linguistics in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Open Linguistics usually cover Language and Linguistics (240 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (126 papers) and Linguistics and Language (100 papers) specifically the topics of Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (118 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (94 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (86 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Open Linguistics are Kobin H. Kendrick, Mark Dingemanse, N. J. Enfield, Alexandra Georgakopoulou, Elizabeth Manrique, Arnulf Deppermann, Tommi Jantunen, Giovanni Rossi, Paul Drew and Stephen C. Levinson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Open Linguistics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Open Linguistics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Open Linguistics.

Countries where authors publish in Open Linguistics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Open Linguistics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Open Linguistics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Open Linguistics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025