Open Economies Review

1.1k papers and 12.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Open Economies Review in the last decades have received a total of 12.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Open Economies Review usually cover General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (791 papers), Economics and Econometrics (710 papers) and Finance (544 papers) specifically the topics of Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (547 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (470 papers) and Global trade and economics (236 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Open Economies Review are Joshua Aizenman, Jae Wook Lee, Jeffrey A. Frankel, Menzie Chinn, Mohsen Bahmani‐Óskooee, Philip R. Lane, George S. Tavlas, Michael J. Artis, Peter Wilson and Michele Fratianni.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Open Economies Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Open Economies Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Open Economies Review.

Countries where authors publish in Open Economies Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Open Economies Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Open Economies Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Open Economies Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025