This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Oncology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Oncology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oncology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Oncology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Oncology.
About Oncology
The 5.5k papers published in Oncology in the last decades have received a total of 107.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Oncology usually cover Oncology (936 papers), Hepatology (342 papers), Cancer Research (367 papers), Otorhinolaryngology (114 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (588 papers) specifically the topics of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (319 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (198 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (183 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (180 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (130 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (114 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (113 papers) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (110 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Oncology are Masatoshi Kudo, Reiki Nishimura, Nobuyuki Arima, Rumiko Tashima, Yasuyuki Nishiyama, Yasuo Toyozumi, Mamiko Fujisue, Tomofumi Osako, Peter Carmeliet and Yosef Yarden.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.