NeuroToxicology

3.0k papers and 97.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.0k papers published in NeuroToxicology in the last decades have received a total of 97.1k indexed citations. Papers published in NeuroToxicology usually cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (971 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (692 papers) and Molecular Biology (653 papers) specifically the topics of Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (583 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (456 papers) and Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (357 papers). The most active scholars publishing in NeuroToxicology are Michael Aschner, Stephen C. Bondy, Bernard Weiss, Richard M. LoPachin, K. Roger Aoki, Judie Walton, David C. Bellinger, Deborah A. Cory‐Slechta, Lucio G. Costa and Tomás R. Guilarte.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in NeuroToxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in NeuroToxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in NeuroToxicology.

Countries where authors publish in NeuroToxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in NeuroToxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in NeuroToxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NeuroToxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025