Countries where authors publish in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY more than expected).
Fields of papers published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
This network shows the impact of papers published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY.
About MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
The 814 papers published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY in the last decades have received a total of 10.1k indexed citations . Papers published in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY usually cover Surgery (682 papers), Rehabilitation (105 papers) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (132 papers) specifically the topics of Shoulder Injury and Treatment (288 papers), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (192 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (164 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (143 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (135 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (100 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (90 papers) and Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (82 papers). The most active scholars publishing in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY are Giuseppe Porcellini, Alessandro Castagna, Giovanni Merolla, Paolo Paladini, Vincenzo Denaro, Raffaele Garofalo, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Roberto Rotini, Rocco Papalia and Stefano Petrillo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.