Mnemosyne

1.8k papers and 2.9k indexed citations

About

The 1.8k papers published in Mnemosyne in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Mnemosyne usually cover Anthropology (944 papers), Archeology (577 papers) and Philosophy (411 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (922 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (382 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (367 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mnemosyne are W.J. Verdenius, Jaap Mansfeld, Jacqueline Klooster, D.M. Schenkeveld, C.J. Ruijgh, Richard Evans, Brent D. Shaw, Olga Spevak, Eleanor Dickey and Nigel B. Crowther.

In The Last Decade

Mnemosyne

735 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Fields of papers published in Mnemosyne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Mnemosyne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mnemosyne.

Countries where authors publish in Mnemosyne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mnemosyne. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mnemosyne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mnemosyne more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026