Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section A

5.3k citations
440 papers · indexed · active since 1950

Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section A

423 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Peers

Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section A
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Mechanical Engineering 2.3k
  • Mechanics of Materials 1.9k
  • Control and Systems Engineering 1.8k
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 1.3k
  • Ocean Engineering 1.0k
Replace International Journal of Surface Mining Reclamation and Environment with:
International Journal of Surface Mining Reclamation and Environment United States
Journal of Sustainable Mining Poland
Mining of Mineral Deposits Ukraine
Geosystem Engineering South Korea
International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering China
Mining Engineering United States
Journal of Coal Science and Engineering (China) China
International journal of energy and environmental engineering India
Rudarsko-geološko-naftni zbornik Croatia
Petroleum China
Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section A relative to International Journal of Surface Mining Reclamation and Environment United States International Journal of Surface Mining Reclamation and Environment's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
International Journal of Surface Mining Reclamation and Environment · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section A

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section A. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section A with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section A more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section A

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section A. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section A.

About Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section A

The 440 papers published in Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section A in the last decades have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section A usually cover Mechanics of Materials (157 papers), Ocean Engineering (92 papers) and Control and Systems Engineering (137 papers) specifically the topics of Mining Techniques and Economics (131 papers), Rock Mechanics and Modeling (130 papers) and Mineral Processing and Grinding (129 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section A are Roussos Dimitrakopoulos, Finn Ouchterlony, Hooman Askari-Nasab, Paul L. Younger, T. N. Singh, John Hadjigeorgiou, Italo Onederra, Erkan Topal, Salih Ramazan and Ataç Başçetin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026