Minerva Anestesiologica

1.2k papers and 7.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Minerva Anestesiologica in the last decades have received a total of 7.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Minerva Anestesiologica usually cover Surgery (586 papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (372 papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (321 papers) specifically the topics of Anesthesia and Pain Management (315 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (279 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (196 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Minerva Anestesiologica are Massimo Antonelli, Davide Chiumello, Domenico Luca Grieco, Davide Eleuteri, Luca S. Menga, Davide Cattano, Serkan Tulgar, Alessandro De Cassai, Patricia Lavand’homme and Dario Bugada.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Minerva Anestesiologica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Minerva Anestesiologica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Minerva Anestesiologica.

Countries where authors publish in Minerva Anestesiologica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Minerva Anestesiologica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Minerva Anestesiologica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minerva Anestesiologica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025