Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section C
517 papers
receiving
5.3k citations
Peers
Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section C
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
Mechanical Engineering4.2k
Biomedical Engineering2.6k
Water Science and Technology1.7k
Materials Chemistry744
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering629
Replace International Journal of Chemical Engineering with:
International Journal of Chemical EngineeringChina
South African Journal of Chemical EngineeringIndonesia
KONA Powder and Particle JournalJapan
Journal of Mining and Metallurgy Section B MetallurgyChina
Reviews in Chemical EngineeringMalaysia
Materials Science for Energy TechnologiesIndia
Separation and Purification ReviewsIndia
Egyptian Journal of PetroleumEgypt
Sustainable Environment ResearchTaiwan
Chemical engineering progressUnited States
Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section Crelative toInternational Journal of Chemical EngineeringChinaInternational Journal of Chemical Engineering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
International Journal of Chemical Engineering · 1×
×1.84k/2kME
×0.73k/4kBE
×0.82k/2kWST
×0.4744/2kMC
×0.5629/1kIME
Citations per year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section C
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section C. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section C with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section C more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section C
This network shows the impact of papers published in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section C. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section C.
About Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section C
The 551 papers published in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section C in the last decades have received a total of 5.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section C usually cover Water Science and Technology (190 papers), Mechanical Engineering (423 papers) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (37 papers) specifically the topics of Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (211 papers), Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics (189 papers) and Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (183 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section C are D. R. Swinbourne, K.S. Mohandas, Mark I. Pownceby, D.M. Muir, Pekka Taskinen, Peter C. Hayes, Chin Eng Loo, Evgueni Jak, Warren J. Bruckard and Mark Aylmore.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.