Mind

3.1k papers and 40.2k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 3.1k papers published in Mind in the last decades have received a total of 40.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Mind usually cover Philosophy (975 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (801 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (360 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy and Theoretical Science (771 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (512 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (264 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mind are John R. Searle, Alfred North Whitehead, David Lewis, Dorothy Edgington, Gottlob Frege, Niko Kolodny, Paul Boghossian, John Divers, Colin McGinn and Timothy Williamson.

In The Last Decade

Mind

1.4k papers receiving 22.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Mind

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Mind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mind.

Countries where authors publish in Mind

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mind. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mind more than expected).

Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language 1969 2026 1988 2007 3.4k
  1. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (1969)
  2. The Non-Identity of a Material Thing and Its Matter (2003)

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026