Anesthesia & Analgesia

27.0k papers and 702.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 27.0k papers published in Anesthesia & Analgesia in the last decades have received a total of 702.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Anesthesia & Analgesia usually cover Surgery (11.3k papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (9.2k papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (6.9k papers) specifically the topics of Anesthesia and Pain Management (6.1k papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (6.0k papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5.0k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anesthesia & Analgesia are Franklin Dexter, Paul F. White, Edmond I. Eger, Patrick Schober, Frances Chung, Daniel I. Sessler, Lothar A. Schwarte, Christa Boer, Zeev N. Kain and Paul F. White.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Anesthesia & Analgesia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anesthesia & Analgesia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anesthesia & Analgesia.

Countries where authors publish in Anesthesia & Analgesia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anesthesia & Analgesia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anesthesia & Analgesia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anesthesia & Analgesia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025