Marine and Freshwater Research

5.5k papers and 134.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.5k papers published in Marine and Freshwater Research in the last decades have received a total of 134.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Marine and Freshwater Research usually cover Ecology (2.8k papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.4k papers) and Global and Planetary Change (2.3k papers) specifically the topics of Marine and fisheries research (1.9k papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (1.9k papers) and Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (904 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Marine and Freshwater Research are Ove Hoegh‐Guldberg, Nick C. Davidson, RG Chittleborough, Terence I. Walker, Jto Kirk, A.J. Underwood, Grant J. West, DJ Rochford, Colin A. Simpfendorfer and Alistair J. Hobday.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Marine and Freshwater Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Marine and Freshwater Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Marine and Freshwater Research.

Countries where authors publish in Marine and Freshwater Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Marine and Freshwater Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Marine and Freshwater Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marine and Freshwater Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025