Leukemia Research Reports
- Topics
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
In The Last Decade
Leukemia Research Reports
316 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Hematology 889
- Molecular Biology 596
- Genetics 475
- Oncology 395
- Immunology 282
Countries where authors publish in Leukemia Research Reports
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Leukemia Research Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Leukemia Research Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leukemia Research Reports more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Leukemia Research Reports
This network shows the impact of papers published in Leukemia Research Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Leukemia Research Reports.
About Leukemia Research Reports
The 384 papers published in Leukemia Research Reports in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Leukemia Research Reports usually cover Hematology (248 papers), Genetics (154 papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (70 papers) specifically the topics of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (171 papers), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (95 papers) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (92 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Leukemia Research Reports are António Almeida, Fernando Ramos, Prithviraj Bose, Steven Grant, Peng Zhang, Hans Carl Hasselbalch, Shinichiro Takahashi, Masaharu Nohgawa, Satoko Oka and Michael Medinger.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.