L’Espace géographique

1.2k papers and 6.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in L’Espace géographique in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations. Papers published in L’Espace géographique usually cover Sociology and Political Science (717 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (234 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (155 papers) specifically the topics of French Urban and Social Studies (595 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (230 papers) and Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (95 papers). The most active scholars publishing in L’Espace géographique are Roger Brunet, Bernard Debarbieux, Joël Bonnemaison, Jean‐Marc Offner, Jean-Marie Miossec, Daniel A. Griffith, Dénise Pumain, Pierre Frankhauser, Augustin Berque and Michel Bruneau.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in L’Espace géographique

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in L’Espace géographique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in L’Espace géographique.

Countries where authors publish in L’Espace géographique

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in L’Espace géographique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in L’Espace géographique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L’Espace géographique more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025