Countries where authors publish in The Law and Development Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Law and Development Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Law and Development Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Law and Development Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Law and Development Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Law and Development Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Law and Development Review.
About The Law and Development Review
The 247 papers published in The Law and Development Review in the last decades have received a total of 838 indexed citations . Papers published in The Law and Development Review usually cover Development (32 papers), Law (55 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (38 papers) specifically the topics of Human Rights and Development (48 papers), International Development and Aid (31 papers), World Trade Organization Law (29 papers), Global trade and economics (26 papers), International Arbitration and Investment Law (23 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (22 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (20 papers) and Land Rights and Reforms (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Law and Development Review are Andreas Neef, Claudia R. Williamson, Peter T. Leeson, Yong‐Shik Lee, Wouter Vandenhole, Michael J. Trebilcock, Liz Alden Wily, Julien Chaisse, Jai S. Mah and Bryan Mercurio.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.