L Évolution Psychiatrique

1.1k papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in L Évolution Psychiatrique in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in L Évolution Psychiatrique usually cover Clinical Psychology (799 papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (236 papers) and General Health Professions (223 papers) specifically the topics of Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (662 papers), Historical and Scientific Studies (234 papers) and Health, Medicine and Society (194 papers). The most active scholars publishing in L Évolution Psychiatrique are Yann Auxéméry, Richard Rechtman, Thomas Rabeyron, Jean Garrabé, Renaud Évrard, Laurence J. Kirmayer, Bernard Andrieu, Olivier Douville, Daniel Allen and Allan H. Young.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in L Évolution Psychiatrique

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in L Évolution Psychiatrique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in L Évolution Psychiatrique.

Countries where authors publish in L Évolution Psychiatrique

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in L Évolution Psychiatrique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in L Évolution Psychiatrique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L Évolution Psychiatrique more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025