National Remote Sensing Bulletin

3.3k papers and 12.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.3k papers published in National Remote Sensing Bulletin in the last decades have received a total of 12.1k indexed citations. Papers published in National Remote Sensing Bulletin usually cover Atmospheric Science (1.7k papers), Global and Planetary Change (1.0k papers) and Aerospace Engineering (496 papers) specifically the topics of Remote Sensing and Land Use (1.3k papers), Environmental Changes in China (608 papers) and Remote Sensing in Agriculture (407 papers). The most active scholars publishing in National Remote Sensing Bulletin are Hanqiu Xu, Richard Kelly, Bingfang Wu, Jin Chen, Yong Zhang, Tsuneo Matsunaga, Saro Lee, Peng Gong, Michael E. Schaepman and Qinhuo Liu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in National Remote Sensing Bulletin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in National Remote Sensing Bulletin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in National Remote Sensing Bulletin.

Countries where authors publish in National Remote Sensing Bulletin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in National Remote Sensing Bulletin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in National Remote Sensing Bulletin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Remote Sensing Bulletin more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025