Journal of Official Statistics

827 papers and 9.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 827 papers published in Journal of Official Statistics in the last decades have received a total of 9.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Official Statistics usually cover Sociology and Political Science (333 papers), Statistics and Probability (333 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (203 papers) specifically the topics of Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (249 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (141 papers) and Census and Population Estimation (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Official Statistics are Edith D. de Leeuw, Douglas D. Heckathorn, Erik Volz, Jerome P. Reiter, Joop J. Hox, J. Michael Brick, Kristen Olson, Sung-Hee Lee, Linda L. Stinson and Jeffrey C. Moore.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Official Statistics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Official Statistics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Official Statistics.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Official Statistics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Official Statistics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Official Statistics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Official Statistics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025