Journal of Human Trafficking

365 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 365 papers published in Journal of Human Trafficking in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Human Trafficking usually cover Sociology and Political Science (341 papers), Epidemiology (157 papers) and Clinical Psychology (119 papers) specifically the topics of Sex work and related issues (331 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (156 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (102 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Human Trafficking are Kamala Kempadoo, Hanni Stoklosa, Seo-Young Cho, Andrea J. Nichols, Dominique Roe‐Sepowitz, Stephanie Limoncelli, Sheldon X. Zhang, Laura Cordisco Tsai, Amy Farrell and Bruce R. DeForge.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Human Trafficking

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Human Trafficking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Human Trafficking.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Human Trafficking

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Human Trafficking. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Human Trafficking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Human Trafficking more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025