Journal of Histotechnology

1.2k papers and 8.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Journal of Histotechnology in the last decades have received a total of 8.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Histotechnology usually cover Molecular Biology (622 papers), Surgery (109 papers) and Pharmacology (97 papers) specifically the topics of Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (427 papers), Biological Stains and Phytochemicals (86 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Histotechnology are Donna M. Simmons, Larry W. Swanson, Jeffrey L. Arriza, Michael Titford, Charles J. Churukian, Anthony F. Henwood, William E. Grizzle, Winsome Garvey, Eric A. Schenk and J. A. Kiernan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Histotechnology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Histotechnology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Histotechnology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Histotechnology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Histotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Histotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Histotechnology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025