Journal of Disability & Religion

219 papers and 505 indexed citations i.

About

The 219 papers published in Journal of Disability & Religion in the last decades have received a total of 505 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Disability & Religion usually cover Clinical Psychology (99 papers), Sociology and Political Science (92 papers) and Health (49 papers) specifically the topics of Family and Disability Support Research (71 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (47 papers) and Disability Rights and Representation (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Disability & Religion are Nick J. Watson, Samta P. Pandya, Erik W. Carter, Rachel Forrester‐Jones, Andrew Parker, Melinda Jones Ault, Paul Heintzman, P. David Howe, Amos Yong and Zolinda Stoneman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Disability & Religion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Disability & Religion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Disability & Religion.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Disability & Religion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Disability & Religion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Disability & Religion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Disability & Religion more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025