Journal of commodity markets

275 papers and 3.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 275 papers published in Journal of commodity markets in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of commodity markets usually cover Economics and Econometrics (256 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (115 papers) and Finance (82 papers) specifically the topics of Market Dynamics and Volatility (234 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (89 papers) and Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (79 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of commodity markets are Brian M. Lucey, Frank Asche, Atle Øglend, Sile Li, Aktham Maghyereh, Roy Endré Dahl, Muhammad Yahya, Stefan Trück, Joëlle Miffre and Taryn Garlock.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of commodity markets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of commodity markets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of commodity markets.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of commodity markets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of commodity markets. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of commodity markets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of commodity markets more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025