Journal of CO2 Utilization

2.7k papers and 85.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Journal of CO2 Utilization in the last decades have received a total of 85.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of CO2 Utilization usually cover Materials Chemistry (920 papers), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (831 papers) and Catalysis (826 papers) specifically the topics of Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (711 papers), Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (648 papers) and CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts (609 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of CO2 Utilization are Adisa Azapagic, Rosa M. Cuéllar-Franca, Muhammad Tahir, Nor Aishah Saidina Amin, Abass A. Olajire, Mohammad Reza Rahimpour, Yixin Shao, Duo Zhang, Samrand Saeidi and Tung‐Chai Ling.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of CO2 Utilization

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of CO2 Utilization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of CO2 Utilization.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of CO2 Utilization

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of CO2 Utilization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of CO2 Utilization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of CO2 Utilization more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025