The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology

3.8k citations
594 papers · indexed · active since 1950

The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology

522 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Management Science and Operations Research 857
  • Computer Networks and Communications 785
  • Control and Systems Engineering 684
  • Artificial Intelligence 676
  • Aerospace Engineering 632
Replace International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics with:
International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics China
CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology China
Studies in Informatics and Control Romania
Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering United States
Control and Cybernetics Poland
International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence Spain
4OR France
Applied System Innovation Italy
International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation China
Discrete Optimization United States
The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology relative to International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics China International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology.

About The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology

The 594 papers published in The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations . Papers published in The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology usually cover Management Science and Operations Research (160 papers), Control and Systems Engineering (137 papers) and Aerospace Engineering (138 papers) specifically the topics of Simulation Techniques and Applications (117 papers), Military Strategy and Technology (55 papers) and Military Defense Systems Analysis (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology are Levent Yılmaz, Saurabh Mittal, Sajib Sen, Zahid Akhtar, Dipankar Dasgupta, Paul K Davis, Michael D. Proctor, Bernard P. Zeigler, M. Gargalakos and Raymond R. Hill.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026