Countries where authors publish in Journal of Composites Technology and Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Composites Technology and Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Composites Technology and Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Composites Technology and Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Composites Technology and Research
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Composites Technology and Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Composites Technology and Research.
About Journal of Composites Technology and Research
The 502 papers published in Journal of Composites Technology and Research in the last decades have received a total of 8.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Composites Technology and Research usually cover Mechanics of Materials (408 papers), Ceramics and Composites (41 papers) and Mechanical Engineering (250 papers) specifically the topics of Mechanical Behavior of Composites (345 papers), Fiber-reinforced polymer composites (85 papers) and Fatigue and fracture mechanics (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Composites Technology and Research are JE Masters, GP Sendeckyj, WS Johnson, WW Stinchcomb, Shoei‐Shen Wang, KL Reifsnider, TK O’Brien, DW Wilson, WS Johnson and NJ Pagano.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.