Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy

200 papers and 286 indexed citations i.

About

The 200 papers published in Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 286 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy usually cover Philosophy (122 papers), Sociology and Political Science (108 papers) and Religious studies (58 papers) specifically the topics of Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (78 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (77 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy are Elliot R. Wolfson, Martin S. Jaffee, Moshé Idel, Paul Fenton, Boaz Huss, Michael E. Swartz, Jonathan Schofer, Jeffrey Shandler, Martha Himmelfarb and Elliott Horowitz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025