JCO Oncology Practice

1.3k papers and 9.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in JCO Oncology Practice in the last decades have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations. Papers published in JCO Oncology Practice usually cover Oncology (567 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (439 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (332 papers) specifically the topics of Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (278 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (247 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (193 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JCO Oncology Practice are Arjun Gupta, Olga Martínez‐Sáez, Moshe Chaim Ornstein, Jennifer Tran, Caroline Schenkel, Timothy J. Brown, Richard L. Schilsky, Heidi D. Klepin, Reginald Tucker‐Seeley and Abbey Fingeret.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in JCO Oncology Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JCO Oncology Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JCO Oncology Practice.

Countries where authors publish in JCO Oncology Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JCO Oncology Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JCO Oncology Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JCO Oncology Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025