Japanese Dental Science Review

350 papers and 7.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 350 papers published in Japanese Dental Science Review in the last decades have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Japanese Dental Science Review usually cover Oral Surgery (97 papers), Periodontics (84 papers) and Molecular Biology (77 papers) specifically the topics of Dental materials and restorations (59 papers), Oral microbiology and periodontitis research (57 papers) and Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Japanese Dental Science Review are Michiyo Matsumoto‐Nakano, Jorge Perdigão, Seiji Ban, Takao Hanawa, Osamu Suzuki, Takuya Matsumoto, Masahiro Okada, Andréa Cândido dos Reis, Simone Kreve and Koichiro Matsuo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Japanese Dental Science Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Japanese Dental Science Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Japanese Dental Science Review.

Countries where authors publish in Japanese Dental Science Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Japanese Dental Science Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Japanese Dental Science Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Japanese Dental Science Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025