JAMIA Open

624 papers and 4.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 624 papers published in JAMIA Open in the last decades have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations. Papers published in JAMIA Open usually cover Health Information Management (181 papers), General Health Professions (170 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (140 papers) specifically the topics of Electronic Health Records Systems (149 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (82 papers) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (79 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JAMIA Open are Roger G. Mark, Tom Pollard, Alistair E. W. Johnson, Jesse D. Raffa, Ann Borda, Kathleen Gray, Tsung-Ting Kuo, Grace Shin, Gretchen Purcell Jackson and Yuanyuan Feng.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in JAMIA Open

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JAMIA Open. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JAMIA Open.

Countries where authors publish in JAMIA Open

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JAMIA Open. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JAMIA Open with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JAMIA Open more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025