JAMA Surgery

2.2k papers and 87.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in JAMA Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 87.7k indexed citations. Papers published in JAMA Surgery usually cover Surgery (1.1k papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (450 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (377 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (393 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (222 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (157 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JAMA Surgery are Olle Ljungqvist, Kenneth C. H. Fearon, Michael J. Scott, Justin B. Dimick, Timothy M. Pawlik, Christopher L. Wu, Melinda Maggard‐Gibbons, Amir A. Ghaferi, Adil H. Haider and Michael J. Englesbe.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in JAMA Surgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JAMA Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JAMA Surgery.

Countries where authors publish in JAMA Surgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JAMA Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JAMA Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JAMA Surgery more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025