Journal of Eating Disorders

1.2k papers and 14.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Journal of Eating Disorders in the last decades have received a total of 14.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Eating Disorders usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.2k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (288 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (257 papers) specifically the topics of Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1.1k papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (372 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (279 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Eating Disorders are Phillipa Hay, Stephen Touyz, Ulrike Schmidt, Janet Treasure, Jonathan Mond, Philip S. Mehler, Deborah Mitchison, Øyvind Rø, Kathleen M. Pike and Patricia E. Dunne.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Eating Disorders

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Eating Disorders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Eating Disorders.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Eating Disorders

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Eating Disorders. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Eating Disorders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Eating Disorders more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025