Therapeutic Advances in Infectious DiseaseUnited States
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious DiseasesUnited States
Therapeutic Advances in Drug SafetyUnited States
Infectious Diseases NowFrance
Recent Patents on Anti-Infective Drug DiscoveryUnited States
Paediatrics and International Child HealthIndia
Reviews in Medical MicrobiologyUnited Kingdom
Infection Prevention in Practicerelative toGERMSRomaniaGERMS's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
GERMS · 1×
×1.7378/219AMB
×0.8385/469MM
×2.673/28GD
×0.6719/1kID
×0.6155/245ENDOC
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Infection Prevention in Practice
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Infection Prevention in Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Infection Prevention in Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Infection Prevention in Practice more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Infection Prevention in Practice
This network shows the impact of papers published in Infection Prevention in Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Infection Prevention in Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.