Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

1.0k papers and 7.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental in the last decades have received a total of 7.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (364 papers), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (285 papers) and Epidemiology (281 papers) specifically the topics of Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (280 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (241 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (187 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental are John A. Kellum, John G. Laffey, Simon Lambden, Can İnce, Joerg C. Schefold, Carmen A. Pfortmueller, Claudia Scorcella, E. Christiaan Boerma, Marcus J. Schultz and Paolo Pelosi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental.

Countries where authors publish in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intensive Care Medicine Experimental more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025