Replace EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing with:
EURASIP Journal on Image and Video ProcessingChina
IEE Proceedings - Vision Image and Signal ProcessingUnited Kingdom
IEEE Consumer Electronics MagazineUnited States
Integrated Computer-Aided EngineeringUnited States
International Journal of Automation and ComputingChina
IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational IntelligenceChina
IEEE MultimediaUnited States
Cognitive ComputationChina
IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental SystemsChina
Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic EngineeringChina
EURASIP Journal on Image and Video ProcessingChinaView profile →
Citations per field, relative to IET Computer Vision
IET Computer Vision · 1×
×1.511.8kCVPR
×1.12.2kAI
×1.62.6kMT
×0.8932AE
×0.8878BE
Citations per year, relative to IET Computer Vision
IET Computer Vision · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in IET Computer Vision
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in IET Computer Vision. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in IET Computer Vision with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IET Computer Vision more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in IET Computer Vision. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in IET Computer Vision.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.