Innovative Surgical Sciences

191 papers and 1.3k indexed citations

About

The 191 papers published in Innovative Surgical Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Innovative Surgical Sciences usually cover Surgery (119 papers), Oncology (39 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (30 papers) specifically the topics of Surgical Simulation and Training (19 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (18 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (18 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Innovative Surgical Sciences are W. Reinpold, Thomas Neumuth, Ferdinand Köckerling, Arved Weimann, Gregory D. Hager, S. Swaroop Vedula, H. Niebuhr, B J M Hermans, Ivo A. M. J. Broeders and Benedikt J. Braun.

In The Last Decade

Innovative Surgical Sciences

165 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Countries where authors publish in Innovative Surgical Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Innovative Surgical Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Innovative Surgical Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Innovative Surgical Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Innovative Surgical Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Innovative Surgical Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Innovative Surgical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026