Indian Journal of Anaesthesia

2.8k papers and 20.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in Indian Journal of Anaesthesia in the last decades have received a total of 20.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Indian Journal of Anaesthesia usually cover Surgery (1.4k papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (1.1k papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (694 papers) specifically the topics of Anesthesia and Pain Management (735 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (639 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (471 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Indian Journal of Anaesthesia are Mohamed Daabiss, Richa Saroa, Sanjeev Palta, Anshu Palta, SBala Bhaskar, Geeta Chaudhary, Rakesh Garg, Ashok Jadon, Abhijit Nair and SS Harsoor.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Indian Journal of Anaesthesia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Indian Journal of Anaesthesia.

Countries where authors publish in Indian Journal of Anaesthesia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Indian Journal of Anaesthesia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Indian Journal of Anaesthesia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025