Hydrometallurgy

5.8k papers and 190.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.8k papers published in Hydrometallurgy in the last decades have received a total of 190.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Hydrometallurgy usually cover Mechanical Engineering (4.0k papers), Biomedical Engineering (3.3k papers) and Water Science and Technology (2.2k papers) specifically the topics of Extraction and Separation Processes (3.5k papers), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (3.1k papers) and Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (1.9k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Hydrometallurgy are H.R. Watling, Frank K. Crundwell, Bohumil Volesky, David Dreisinger, Chu Yong Cheng, J. E. Dutrizac, Francisco José Alguacil, George P. Demopoulos, Matthew J. Slater and Alison Lewis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Hydrometallurgy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Hydrometallurgy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Hydrometallurgy.

Countries where authors publish in Hydrometallurgy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Hydrometallurgy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Hydrometallurgy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hydrometallurgy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025