Countries where authors publish in Human-wildlife interactions
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human-wildlife interactions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human-wildlife interactions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human-wildlife interactions more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Human-wildlife interactions
This network shows the impact of papers published in Human-wildlife interactions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human-wildlife interactions.
About Human-wildlife interactions
The 226 papers published in Human-wildlife interactions in the last decades have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Human-wildlife interactions usually cover Ecology (158 papers), Ecological Modeling (12 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (29 papers), Small Animals (16 papers) and Developmental Biology (4 papers) specifically the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (104 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (46 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (34 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (29 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (22 papers), Ecology and biodiversity studies (20 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (16 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human-wildlife interactions are Chris R. Dickman, Richard A. Dolbeer, John A. Bissonette, Giovanna Massei, Carl W. Lackey, Jon P. Beckmann, Richard Bunting, Sugoto Roy, Lawrence J. Cook and Clayton K. Nielsen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.