History of Psychology

575 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 575 papers published in History of Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in History of Psychology usually cover General Psychology (360 papers), Clinical Psychology (156 papers) and Social Psychology (151 papers) specifically the topics of Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (360 papers), Social Representations and Identity (109 papers) and Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in History of Psychology are Krystine Irene Batcho, Leeat Granek, Jeremy Trevelyan Burman, Serge Nicolas, Alexandra Rutherford, Stephanie A. Shields, Christopher D. Green, Jeffrey Jensen Arnett, Sunil Bhatia and Michael Pettit.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in History of Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in History of Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in History of Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in History of Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in History of Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in History of Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites History of Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025