Global Responsibility to Protect

318 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 318 papers published in Global Responsibility to Protect in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Global Responsibility to Protect usually cover Political Science and International Relations (291 papers), Sociology and Political Science (205 papers) and Development (54 papers) specifically the topics of Global Peace and Security Dynamics (271 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (146 papers) and International Law and Human Rights (139 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Global Responsibility to Protect are Jennifer M. Welsh, Amitav Acharya, Edward C. Luck, Kai Michael Kenkel, Oliver Stuenkel, Alex J. Bellamy, Paul Williams, Jürgen Haacke, Ramesh Thakur and Ian Hall.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Global Responsibility to Protect

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Global Responsibility to Protect. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Global Responsibility to Protect.

Countries where authors publish in Global Responsibility to Protect

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Global Responsibility to Protect. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Global Responsibility to Protect with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Responsibility to Protect more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025