Geophysical monograph

303 papers and 23.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 303 papers published in Geophysical monograph in the last decades have received a total of 23.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Geophysical monograph usually cover Astronomy and Astrophysics (96 papers), Geophysics (67 papers) and Atmospheric Science (64 papers) specifically the topics of Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (67 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (49 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geophysical monograph are John M. Eiler, Pierre-Noël Mayaud, Dennis E. Hayes, John J. Mahoney, Millard F. Coffin, Murli H. Manghnani, Garry D. McKenzie, S. R. Hart, Asish R. Basu and James E. Hansen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Geophysical monograph

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Geophysical monograph. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geophysical monograph.

Countries where authors publish in Geophysical monograph

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geophysical monograph. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geophysical monograph with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geophysical monograph more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025