Countries where authors publish in Geological Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geological Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geological Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geological Journal more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Geological Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geological Journal.
About Geological Journal
The 3.8k papers published in Geological Journal in the last decades have received a total of 50.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Geological Journal usually cover Geophysics (2.2k papers), Paleontology (841 papers), Earth-Surface Processes (737 papers), Geology (497 papers) and Geochemistry and Petrology (488 papers) specifically the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (1.9k papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (1.2k papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (857 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (808 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (770 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (747 papers), Geological formations and processes (716 papers) and Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (472 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geological Journal are Ian D. Somerville, J.R.L. Allen, R. G. C. Bathurst, M. Santosh, Bernard Bonin, Gerhard Voll, Alastair H. F. Robertson, V. Paul Wright, Víctor A. Ramos and Bernard Barbarin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.