Countries where authors publish in Geochemical Perspectives Letters
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geochemical Perspectives Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geochemical Perspectives Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geochemical Perspectives Letters more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Geochemical Perspectives Letters
This network shows the impact of papers published in Geochemical Perspectives Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geochemical Perspectives Letters.
About Geochemical Perspectives Letters
The 367 papers published in Geochemical Perspectives Letters in the last decades have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Geochemical Perspectives Letters usually cover Geophysics (154 papers), Geochemistry and Petrology (59 papers) and Paleontology (67 papers) specifically the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (134 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (66 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (66 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geochemical Perspectives Letters are Hans Keppler, Frédéric Moynier, Matthew J. Kohn, J. Li, Mengran Du, Kaiwen Ta, S. Dasgupta, Hongzhou Xu, Blair Schoene and C. Brenhin Keller.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.