Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences

4.7k papers and 63.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.7k papers published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences in the last decades have received a total of 63.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences usually cover Molecular Biology (3.0k papers), Cancer Research (745 papers) and Oncology (568 papers) specifically the topics of RNA modifications and cancer (441 papers), Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis (361 papers) and Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (342 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences are Yong Teng, Caleb Jensen, Valentina Oliveri, Süleyman Ergün, Rajender Nandigama, Erik Henke, Nahlah Makki Almansour, Timothy Palzkill, María Esperanza Ruiz and Sebastián Scioli Montoto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.

Countries where authors publish in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025