Forensic Toxicology

661 papers and 10.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 661 papers published in Forensic Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 10.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Forensic Toxicology usually cover Toxicology (423 papers), Pharmacology (192 papers) and Clinical Psychology (163 papers) specifically the topics of Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (423 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (161 papers) and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (150 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forensic Toxicology are Ruri Kikura‐Hanajiri, Nahoko Uchiyama, Yukihiro Goda, Maiko Kawamura, Kanako Watanabe, Kunio Gonmori, Koutaro Hasegawa, Kayoko Minakata, Osamu Suzuki and Takeshi Saito.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Forensic Toxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forensic Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forensic Toxicology.

Countries where authors publish in Forensic Toxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forensic Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forensic Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forensic Toxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025