Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses

239 papers and 239 indexed citations i.

About

The 239 papers published in Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses in the last decades have received a total of 239 indexed citations. Papers published in Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses usually cover Religious studies (148 papers), Sociology and Political Science (75 papers) and Archeology (57 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (124 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (67 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses are Gert J. Steyn, Willy Clarysse, Lieven Boeve, Andries G. Van Aarde, John S. Kloppenborg, Johan Lust, Arie van der Kooij, Wendy Mayer, André de Halleux and Christopher Tuckett.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses.

Countries where authors publish in Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025