Environmental Science Atmospheres

354 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 354 papers published in Environmental Science Atmospheres in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental Science Atmospheres usually cover Atmospheric Science (246 papers), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (163 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (110 papers) specifically the topics of Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (236 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (142 papers) and Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Science Atmospheres are Alastair C. Lewis, Hind A. Al‐Abadleh, Chak K. Chan, Ruifeng Zhang, Tunga Salthammer, Masao Gen, Brix Raphael Go, Matthieu Pommier, Zhancong Liang and Manabu Shiraiwa.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environmental Science Atmospheres

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Science Atmospheres. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Science Atmospheres.

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Science Atmospheres

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Science Atmospheres. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Science Atmospheres with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Science Atmospheres more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025