Countries where authors publish in Endocrine Connections
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Endocrine Connections. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Endocrine Connections with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Endocrine Connections more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Endocrine Connections
This network shows the impact of papers published in Endocrine Connections. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Endocrine Connections.
About Endocrine Connections
The 1.4k papers published in Endocrine Connections in the last decades have received a total of 21.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Endocrine Connections usually cover Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (738 papers), Reproductive Medicine (135 papers) and Nephrology (73 papers) specifically the topics of Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (163 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (162 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (142 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (113 papers), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (109 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (101 papers), Adrenal Hormones and Disorders (97 papers) and Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Endocrine Connections are Nigel Turner, Magdalene K. Montgomery, Thomas Cook, Stavroula Α. Paschou, Jens Faber, Florian W. Kiefer, Davide Carvalho, Nidan Qiao, Natasha C. Bergmann and Finn Gyntelberg.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.