Econometric Reviews

3.2k papers and 56.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.2k papers published in Econometric Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 56.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Econometric Reviews usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.4k papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (981 papers) and Finance (943 papers) specifically the topics of Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (771 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (344 papers) and Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (325 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Econometric Reviews are M. Hashem Pesaran, Tim Bollerslev, Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, Joakim Westerlund, John Geweke, Robert F. Engle, Stephen Bond, Richard Blundell, J. A. Scheinkman and W. Davis Dechert.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Econometric Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Econometric Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Econometric Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Econometric Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Econometric Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Econometric Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Econometric Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025