Electrochemistry Communications

7.3k papers and 328.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.3k papers published in Electrochemistry Communications in the last decades have received a total of 328.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Electrochemistry Communications usually cover Electrical and Electronic Engineering (4.7k papers), Electrochemistry (2.4k papers) and Materials Chemistry (2.1k papers) specifically the topics of Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (2.4k papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (1.5k papers) and Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (1.3k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Electrochemistry Communications are Patrik Schmuki, Khalil Amine, Joseph Wang, Bruce E. Logan, Jan M. Macák, Martin Pumera, Shaoan Cheng, Michael M. Thackeray, Arumugam Manthiram and Yuehe Lin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Electrochemistry Communications

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Electrochemistry Communications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Electrochemistry Communications.

Countries where authors publish in Electrochemistry Communications

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Electrochemistry Communications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Electrochemistry Communications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electrochemistry Communications more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025